↓ Skip to main content

Leaching of silica and uranium and other quantitative aspects of the lithobiontic colonization in a radioactive thermal spring

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, March 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Leaching of silica and uranium and other quantitative aspects of the lithobiontic colonization in a radioactive thermal spring
Published in
Microbial Ecology, March 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf02011708
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. Heinen, A. M. Lauwers

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Lecturer 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 29%
Chemistry 2 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2013.
All research outputs
#7,561,005
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#794
of 2,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,695
of 13,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them