| Title |
Legal implications of range expansions in a terrestrial carnivore: the case of the golden jackal (Canis aureus) in Europe
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-015-0948-y |
| Authors |
Arie Trouwborst, Miha Krofel, John D. C. Linnell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 10 | 13% |
| United States | 6 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 8% |
| Finland | 5 | 6% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 39 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 66% |
| Scientists | 22 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 179 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 43 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 81 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 30 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 51 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2023.
All research outputs
#508,478
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#48
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,430
of 281,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.