| Title |
Redistribution of implanted dopants in GaN
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Electronic Materials, March 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11664-999-0025-y |
| Authors |
X. A. Cao, R. G. Wilson, J. C. Zolper, S. J. Pearton, J. Han, R. J. Shul, D. J. Rieger, R. K. Singh, M. Fu, V. Scarvepalli, J. A. Sekhar, J. M. Zavada |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 33% |
| Professor | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 33% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
| Engineering | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,561,005
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Electronic Materials
#238
of 1,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,157
of 35,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Electronic Materials
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,367 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.