↓ Skip to main content

Computational Thermodynamics Aided High-Entropy Alloy Design

Overview of attention for article published in JOM, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
283 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
374 Mendeley
Title
Computational Thermodynamics Aided High-Entropy Alloy Design
Published in
JOM, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11837-012-0365-6
Authors

Chuan Zhang, Fan Zhang, Shuanglin Chen, Weisheng Cao

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 368 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 20%
Researcher 51 14%
Student > Master 48 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 7%
Student > Bachelor 15 4%
Other 58 16%
Unknown 101 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 170 45%
Engineering 46 12%
Chemistry 6 2%
Physics and Astronomy 5 1%
Chemical Engineering 4 1%
Other 16 4%
Unknown 127 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2015.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from JOM
#334
of 1,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,277
of 166,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOM
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them