↓ Skip to main content

Gold-catalysed oxidation of carbon monoxide

Overview of attention for article published in Gold Bulletin, June 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
830 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
Title
Gold-catalysed oxidation of carbon monoxide
Published in
Gold Bulletin, June 2000
DOI 10.1007/bf03216579
Authors

Geoffrey C Bond, David T Thompson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 237 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 30%
Researcher 35 14%
Student > Master 35 14%
Professor 21 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 6%
Other 45 18%
Unknown 25 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 124 49%
Materials Science 22 9%
Engineering 18 7%
Chemical Engineering 18 7%
Physics and Astronomy 16 6%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 41 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2014.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Gold Bulletin
#67
of 198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,330
of 39,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gold Bulletin
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.