| Title |
Medical applications of virtual reality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Systems, June 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02257178 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard M. Satava |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Lebanon | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 156 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 15% |
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 20% |
| Unknown | 28 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 33 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 18% |
| Engineering | 23 | 14% |
| Psychology | 11 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 18% |
| Unknown | 32 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,561,005
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#284
of 1,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,511
of 25,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,162 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them