↓ Skip to main content

Self-validating presentation and response timing in cognitive paradigms: How and why?

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Research Methods, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Self-validating presentation and response timing in cognitive paradigms: How and why?
Published in
Behavior Research Methods, May 2004
DOI 10.3758/bf03195575
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard R. Plant, Nick Hammond, Garry Turner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 61 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 24%
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Master 10 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 58%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Computer Science 4 6%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 6 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2013.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#1,037
of 2,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,973
of 62,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.