↓ Skip to main content

Effects of starting carbon and solvent-catalyst on the reaction sintering of diamond

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, August 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Effects of starting carbon and solvent-catalyst on the reaction sintering of diamond
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, August 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf00547462
Authors

Hideaki Itoh, Shin Tajima, Masanori Tamaki, Shigeharu Naka

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Researcher 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 50%
Materials Science 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2013.
All research outputs
#7,561,005
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#940
of 4,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,745
of 13,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,637 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.