↓ Skip to main content

Protection against hippocampal CA1 cell loss by post-ischemie hypothermia is dependent on delay of initiation and duration

Overview of attention for article published in Metabolic Brain Disease, March 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
12 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
152 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Protection against hippocampal CA1 cell loss by post-ischemie hypothermia is dependent on delay of initiation and duration
Published in
Metabolic Brain Disease, March 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf01000440
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Carroll, Otto Beek

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 17%
Student > Postgraduate 3 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 17%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 50%
Neuroscience 3 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,561,005
of 23,065,445 outputs
Outputs from Metabolic Brain Disease
#342
of 1,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,473
of 18,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metabolic Brain Disease
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,065,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.