↓ Skip to main content

RE-AIM: Evidence-based standards and a web resource to improve translation of research into practice

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
RE-AIM: Evidence-based standards and a web resource to improve translation of research into practice
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, October 2004
DOI 10.1207/s15324796abm2802_1
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A. Dzewaltowski, Russell E. Glasgow, Lisa M. Klesges, Paul A. Estabrooks, Elizabeth Brock

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 6%
Canada 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 138 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Student > Master 16 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 9%
Other 41 26%
Unknown 18 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 19%
Social Sciences 30 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Sports and Recreations 7 5%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 35 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,753,975
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#707
of 1,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,111
of 61,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.