↓ Skip to main content

Composite biomolecule/PEDOT materials for neural electrodes

Overview of attention for article published in Biointerphases, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Composite biomolecule/PEDOT materials for neural electrodes
Published in
Biointerphases, November 2008
DOI 10.1116/1.2998407
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Asplund, Hans von Holst, Olle Inganäs

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Unknown 153 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 32%
Researcher 30 19%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 26 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 40 26%
Chemistry 23 15%
Materials Science 23 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 8%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 34 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,956,784
of 23,947,846 outputs
Outputs from Biointerphases
#153
of 544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,137
of 93,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biointerphases
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,947,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them