| Title |
Self-expanding nitinol stents: material and design considerations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, September 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-003-2022-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dieter Stoeckel, Alan Pelton, Tom Duerig |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 698 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 687 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 125 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 113 | 16% |
| Researcher | 95 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 95 | 14% |
| Other | 34 | 5% |
| Other | 97 | 14% |
| Unknown | 139 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 278 | 40% |
| Materials Science | 79 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 18 | 3% |
| Other | 49 | 7% |
| Unknown | 176 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,445,969
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#738
of 4,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,635
of 54,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,978 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.