| Title |
Classifying web documents in a hierarchy of categories: a comprehensive study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10844-006-0003-2 |
| Authors |
Michelangelo Ceci, Donato Malerba |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 5% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 17% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 24% |
| Unknown | 9 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 51 | 55% |
| Arts and Humanities | 12 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2013.
All research outputs
#7,561,502
of 23,065,445 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intelligent Information Systems
#45
of 180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,667
of 160,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intelligent Information Systems
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,065,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 180 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them