↓ Skip to main content

Intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi)

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, June 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
181 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi)
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, June 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf01706208
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Rossi, G. Polese, G. Brandi, G. Conti

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 59%
Engineering 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Psychology 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 12 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,997,328
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,867
of 5,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,322
of 25,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them