| Title |
GaN based high temperature strain gauges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, June 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10854-007-9331-4 |
| Authors |
V. Tilak, J. Jiang, P. Batoni, A. Knobloch |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 25% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 7 | 58% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 17% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2013.
All research outputs
#7,561,502
of 23,065,445 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics
#111
of 637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,854
of 69,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,065,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 637 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them