| Title |
Preparation of hydroxyapatite spheres with an internal cavity as a scaffold for hard tissue regeneration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10856-008-3435-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hae-Hyoung Lee, Seok-Jung Hong, Chul-Hwan Kim, Eun-Cheol Kim, Jun-Hyeog Jang, Hong-In Shin, Hae-Won Kim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 10 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 14% |
| Engineering | 4 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,561,502
of 23,065,445 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#316
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,767
of 82,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,065,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.