| Title |
Fast correction of bleed-through distortion in grayscale documents by a blind source separation technique
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR), March 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10032-006-0015-z |
| Authors |
Anna Tonazzini, Emanuele Salerno, Luigi Bedini |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 29% |
| Professor | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
| Researcher | 2 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 9 | 53% |
| Engineering | 5 | 29% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2013.
All research outputs
#7,863,403
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR)
#63
of 161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,002
of 71,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR)
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.