| Title |
PIK3CA mutations in breast cancer are associated with poor outcome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, November 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10549-005-9048-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shao Ying Li, Minna Rong, Fabienne Grieu, Barry Iacopetta |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 18% |
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,561,502
of 23,065,445 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1,684
of 4,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,142
of 146,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#16
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,065,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.