| Title |
Differentiation of toxigenic fungi using hyperspectral imagery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sensing and Instrumentation for Food Quality and Safety, June 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11694-008-9055-z |
| Authors |
Haibo Yao, Zuzana Hruska, Russell Kincaid, Robert L. Brown, Thomas E. Cleveland |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 33% |
| Engineering | 10 | 30% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Sensing and Instrumentation for Food Quality and Safety
#22
of 237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,800
of 96,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sensing and Instrumentation for Food Quality and Safety
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 237 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.