↓ Skip to main content

Biosynthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles by natural precursor clove and their functionalization with amine group

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nanoparticle Research, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
Title
Biosynthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles by natural precursor clove and their functionalization with amine group
Published in
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11051-009-9835-3
Authors

Ashwani Kumar Singh, Mahe Talat, D. P. Singh, O. N. Srivastava

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 205 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 18%
Student > Master 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 62 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 18%
Chemistry 30 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 9%
Engineering 12 6%
Materials Science 10 5%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 66 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,561,502
of 23,065,445 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#248
of 907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,989
of 165,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,065,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 907 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.