↓ Skip to main content

The immunologic aspects of poxvirus oncolytic therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
14 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
The immunologic aspects of poxvirus oncolytic therapy
Published in
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00262-009-0686-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Worschech, D. Haddad, D. F. Stroncek, E. Wang, Francesco M. Marincola, Aladar A. Szalay

Abstract

The concept of using replicating oncolytic viruses in cancer therapy dates to the beginning of the twentieth century. However, in the last few years, an increasing number of pre-clinical and clinical trials have been carried out with promising preliminarily results. Novel, indeed, is the suggestion that viral oncolytic therapy might not operate exclusively through an oncolysis-mediated process but additionally requires the "assistance" of the host's immune system. Originally, the host's immune response was believed to play a predominant obstructive role against viral replication, hence limiting the anti-tumor efficacy of viral vectors. Recent data, however, suggest that the immune response may also play a key role in promoting tumor destruction in association with the oncolytic process. In fact, immune effector pathways activated during oncolytic virus-induced tumor rejection seem to follow a similar pattern to those observed when the broader phenomenon of immune-mediated tissue-specific rejection occurs in other immune-related pathologies. We recently formulated the "Immunologic Constant of Rejection" hypothesis, emphasizing commonalties in transcriptional patterns observed when tissue-destruction occurs: whether with a favorable outcome, such as in tumor rejection and pathogen clearance; or a destructive one, such as in allograft rejection or autoimmunity. Here, we propose that a similar mechanism induces clearance of virally infected tumors and that such a mechanism is primarily dependent on innate immune functions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 36%
Researcher 6 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 56%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Mathematics 1 4%
Unknown 5 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,561,502
of 23,065,445 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#1,040
of 2,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,341
of 94,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#10
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,065,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.