↓ Skip to main content

A bead-based immunogold-silver staining assay on capillary-driven microfluidics

Overview of attention for article published in Biomedical Microdevices, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
A bead-based immunogold-silver staining assay on capillary-driven microfluidics
Published in
Biomedical Microdevices, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10544-018-0284-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ngoc M. Pham, Sebastian Rusch, Yuksel Temiz, Robert D. Lovchik, Hans-Peter Beck, Walter Karlen, Emmanuel Delamarche

Abstract

Point-of-care (POC) diagnostics are critically needed for the detection of infectious diseases, particularly in remote settings where accurate and appropriate diagnosis can save lives. However, it is difficult to implement immunoassays, and specifically immunoassays relying on signal amplification using silver staining, into POC diagnostic devices. Effective immobilization of antibodies in such devices is another challenge. Here, we present strategies for immobilizing capture antibodies (cAbs) in capillary-driven microfluidic chips and implementing a gold-catalyzed silver staining reaction. We illustrate these strategies using a species/anti-species immunoassay and the capillary assembly of fluorescent microbeads functionalized with cAbs in "bead lanes", which are engraved in microfluidic chips. The microfluidic chips are fabricated in silicon (Si) and sealed with a dry film resist. Rabbit IgG antibodies in samples are captured on the beads and bound by detection antibodies (dAbs) conjugated to gold nanoparticles. The gold nanoparticles catalyze the formation of a metallic film of silver, which attenuates fluorescence from the beads in an analyte-concentration dependent manner. The performance of these immunoassays was found comparable to that of assays performed in 96 well microtiter plates using "classical" enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The proof-of-concept method developed here can detect 24.6 ng mL-1 of rabbit IgG antibodies in PBS within 20 min, in comparison to 17.1 ng mL-1 of the same antibodies using a ~140-min-long ELISA protocol. Furthermore, the concept presented here is flexible and necessitate volumes of samples and reagents in the range of just a few microliters.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Unspecified 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 9 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Chemistry 3 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Unspecified 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#6,970,280
of 24,727,020 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Microdevices
#224
of 778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,865
of 335,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Microdevices
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,727,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 778 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.