↓ Skip to main content

Enriching 3D optical surface scans with prior knowledge: tissue thickness computation by exploiting local neighborhoods

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Enriching 3D optical surface scans with prior knowledge: tissue thickness computation by exploiting local neighborhoods
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11548-015-1246-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tobias Wissel, Patrick Stüber, Benjamin Wagner, Ralf Bruder, Achim Schweikard, Floris Ernst

Abstract

Patient immobilization and X-ray-based imaging provide neither a convenient nor a very accurate way to ensure low repositioning errors or to compensate for motion in cranial radiotherapy. We therefore propose an optical tracking device that exploits subcutaneous structures as landmarks in addition to merely spatial registration. To develop such head tracking algorithms, precise and robust computation of these structures is necessary. Here, we show that the tissue thickness can be predicted with high accuracy and moreover exploit local neighborhood information within the laser spot grid on the forehead to further increase this estimation accuracy. We use statistical learning with Support Vector Regression and Gaussian Processes to learn a relationship between optical backscatter features and an MR tissue thickness ground truth. We compare different kernel functions for the data of five different subjects. The incident angle of the laser on the forehead as well as local neighborhoods is incorporated into the feature space. The latter represent the backscatter features from four neighboring laser spots. We confirm that the incident angle has a positive effect on the estimation error of the tissue thickness. The root-mean-square error falls even below 0.15 mm when adding the complete neighborhood information. This prior knowledge also leads to a smoothing effect on the reconstructed skin patch. Learning between different head poses yields similar results. The partial overlap of the point clouds makes the trade-off between novel information and increased feature space dimension obvious and hence feature selection by e.g., sequential forward selection necessary.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 31%
Engineering 2 15%
Materials Science 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2015.
All research outputs
#18,417,643
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#607
of 845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,899
of 262,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#19
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 845 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.