You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cyclic voltammetry of LiCr0.15Mn1.85O4 in an aqueous LiNO3 solution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Power Sources, December 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.099 |
| Authors |
Nikola Cvjeticanin, Ivana Stojkovic, Miodrag Mitric, Slavko Mentus |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 4 | 24% |
| Energy | 3 | 18% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 18% |
| Engineering | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Power Sources
#2,592
of 9,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,538
of 166,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Power Sources
#55
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,670 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.