↓ Skip to main content

Determination of CYP2D6 Gene Copy Number by Pyrosequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Chemistry, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determination of CYP2D6 Gene Copy Number by Pyrosequencing
Published in
Clinical Chemistry, March 2005
DOI 10.1373/clinchem.2004.043182
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erik Söderbäck, Anna-Lena Zackrisson, Bertil Lindblom, Anders Alderborn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 41%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Master 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 56%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Computer Science 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2013.
All research outputs
#7,561,502
of 23,065,445 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Chemistry
#2,640
of 7,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,969
of 60,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Chemistry
#18
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,065,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.