↓ Skip to main content

Current Concepts in Scar Evolution and Control

Overview of attention for article published in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Current Concepts in Scar Evolution and Control
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00266-010-9635-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan D. Widgerow

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 32 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 25%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 12 33%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 58%
Materials Science 5 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,641,993
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#294
of 1,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,854
of 182,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.