↓ Skip to main content

Sample preparation: the weak link in microfluidics-based biodetection

Overview of attention for article published in Biomedical Microdevices, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Sample preparation: the weak link in microfluidics-based biodetection
Published in
Biomedical Microdevices, May 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10544-008-9190-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raymond Mariella

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 3 3%
United States 3 3%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 104 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 40%
Researcher 24 21%
Student > Master 10 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 9 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 44 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 11%
Chemistry 9 8%
Chemical Engineering 5 4%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 12 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2008.
All research outputs
#7,561,502
of 23,065,445 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Microdevices
#237
of 755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,816
of 83,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Microdevices
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,065,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 755 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.