↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Concanavalin A on Na+-Dependent and Na+-Independent Mechanisms for H+ Extrusion in Alveolar Macrophages

Overview of attention for article published in Lung, January 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Effects of Concanavalin A on Na+-Dependent and Na+-Independent Mechanisms for H+ Extrusion in Alveolar Macrophages
Published in
Lung, January 1998
DOI 10.1007/pl00007589
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Bidani, T. A. Heming

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2013.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Lung
#283
of 963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,751
of 94,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them