You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Landscape-scale factors determine occupancy of the critically endangered central rock-rat in arid Australia: The utility of camera trapping
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.027 |
| Authors |
Peter J. McDonald, Anthony D. Griffiths, Catherine E.M. Nano, Chris R. Dickman, Simon J. Ward, Gary W. Luck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 18% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 25 | 23% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2015.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#5,586
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,361
of 294,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#118
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.