You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Locking in loss: Baselines of decline in Australian biodiversity offset policies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.05.017 |
| Authors |
Martine Maron, Joseph W. Bull, Megan C. Evans, Ascelin Gordon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 11 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 76% |
| Scientists | 6 | 24% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Madagascar | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 222 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 17% |
| Researcher | 35 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 13% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 14% |
| Unknown | 62 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 71 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Unknown | 70 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2021.
All research outputs
#667,271
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#549
of 6,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,931
of 401,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#12
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.