↓ Skip to main content

Hanging by a thread: exploring the features of nonresponse in an online young adult cancer survivorship support community

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Survivorship, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Hanging by a thread: exploring the features of nonresponse in an online young adult cancer survivorship support community
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11764-015-0465-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brittani Crook, Elizabeth M. Glowacki, Brad Love, Barbara L. Jones, Catherine Fiona Macpherson, Rebecca H. Johnson

Abstract

Finding helpful information can be challenging for young adult (YA) cancer survivors; thus, it is critical to examine features of online posts that successfully solicit responses and assess how these differ from posts that do not solicit responses. Using posts from an online YA cancer support community, we analyzed initial posts that did and did not receive replies utilizing Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC). Independent t tests revealed significant differences between the sets of posts regarding content, emotions, cognitive processes, pronoun use, and linguistic complexity. More specifically, posts with replies contained fewer words per sentence, had more first-person pronouns, had more expressions of negative emotions, and contained more present tense and past tense verbs. The findings of this study can help improve peer-exchanged support in online communities so that YA cancer survivors can more effectively receive digital support. This research also provides communication researchers, health educators, and care providers a lens for understanding the YA cancer survivorship experience. This research helps survivors be strategic in how they use online forums to seek advice and support. More complete understanding of what kinds of prompts produce responses allows those in need to craft messages in ways that are most likely to elicit support from fellow cancer survivors. These implications for message design extend beyond blogging and can be applicable for text message and email exchanges between cancer patients and their care providers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 91 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 19%
Student > Master 15 16%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 22 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 16%
Social Sciences 9 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 7%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 26 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,066,494
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#236
of 971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,761
of 262,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.