Title |
Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with regeneration ability of seed callus in rice, Oryza sativa L.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, October 1997
|
DOI | 10.1007/s001220050632 |
Authors |
F. Taguchi-Shiobara, S. Y. Lin, K. Tanno, T. Komatsuda, M. Yano, T. Sasaki, S. Oka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 33% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 42% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 17% |
Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,965,094
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#707
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,329
of 30,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.