↓ Skip to main content

Subcortical brain alterations in major depressive disorder: findings from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder working group

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Psychiatry, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
172 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
27 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
72 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
862 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
899 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Subcortical brain alterations in major depressive disorder: findings from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder working group
Published in
Molecular Psychiatry, June 2015
DOI 10.1038/mp.2015.69
Pubmed ID
Authors

L Schmaal, D J Veltman, T G M van Erp, P G Sämann, T Frodl, N Jahanshad, E Loehrer, H Tiemeier, A Hofman, W J Niessen, M W Vernooij, M A Ikram, K Wittfeld, H J Grabe, A Block, K Hegenscheid, H Völzke, D Hoehn, M Czisch, J Lagopoulos, S N Hatton, I B Hickie, R Goya-Maldonado, B Krämer, O Gruber, B Couvy-Duchesne, M E Rentería, L T Strike, N T Mills, G I de Zubicaray, K L McMahon, S E Medland, N G Martin, N A Gillespie, M J Wright, G B Hall, G M MacQueen, E M Frey, A Carballedo, L S van Velzen, M J van Tol, N J van der Wee, I M Veer, H Walter, K Schnell, E Schramm, C Normann, D Schoepf, C Konrad, B Zurowski, T Nickson, A M McIntosh, M Papmeyer, H C Whalley, J E Sussmann, B R Godlewska, P J Cowen, F H Fischer, M Rose, B W J H Penninx, P M Thompson, D P Hibar

Abstract

The pattern of structural brain alterations associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) remains unresolved. This is in part due to small sample sizes of neuroimaging studies resulting in limited statistical power, disease heterogeneity and the complex interactions between clinical characteristics and brain morphology. To address this, we meta-analyzed three-dimensional brain magnetic resonance imaging data from 1728 MDD patients and 7199 controls from 15 research samples worldwide, to identify subcortical brain volumes that robustly discriminate MDD patients from healthy controls. Relative to controls, patients had significantly lower hippocampal volumes (Cohen's d=-0.14, % difference=-1.24). This effect was driven by patients with recurrent MDD (Cohen's d=-0.17, % difference=-1.44), and we detected no differences between first episode patients and controls. Age of onset ⩽21 was associated with a smaller hippocampus (Cohen's d=-0.20, % difference=-1.85) and a trend toward smaller amygdala (Cohen's d=-0.11, % difference=-1.23) and larger lateral ventricles (Cohen's d=0.12, % difference=5.11). Symptom severity at study inclusion was not associated with any regional brain volumes. Sample characteristics such as mean age, proportion of antidepressant users and proportion of remitted patients, and methodological characteristics did not significantly moderate alterations in brain volumes in MDD. Samples with a higher proportion of antipsychotic medication users showed larger caudate volumes in MDD patients compared with controls. This currently largest worldwide effort to identify subcortical brain alterations showed robust smaller hippocampal volumes in MDD patients, moderated by age of onset and first episode versus recurrent episode status.Molecular Psychiatry advance online publication, 30 June 2015; doi:10.1038/mp.2015.69.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 172 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 899 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Unknown 889 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 167 19%
Researcher 130 14%
Student > Bachelor 103 11%
Student > Master 102 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 61 7%
Other 125 14%
Unknown 211 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 170 19%
Psychology 151 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 139 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 3%
Other 90 10%
Unknown 271 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 426. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#68,561
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Psychiatry
#60
of 4,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#623
of 280,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Psychiatry
#1
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.