↓ Skip to main content

Where paths meet and cross: navigation by path integration in the desert ant and the honeybee

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 1,483)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Where paths meet and cross: navigation by path integration in the desert ant and the honeybee
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00359-015-1000-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mandyam V. Srinivasan

Abstract

Animals that travel large distances in search of food need to be equipped with navigation systems that are capable of keeping track of the distance and direction of travel throughout their outbound journey, so that they may return home expeditiously and without losing their way. The challenge of homing is especially acute when the environment is devoid of landmarks. Desert ants and honeybees are able to meet this challenge, despite their minuscule brains and restricted computational capacity. This article reviews some of the processes and mechanisms that underlie the homing abilities of these creatures, which are among the best-understood navigators in the animal kingdom.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 112 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 34%
Student > Bachelor 19 16%
Student > Master 16 14%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 8 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 45%
Neuroscience 19 16%
Engineering 10 9%
Computer Science 9 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 11 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
#743,864
of 24,597,084 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#25
of 1,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,944
of 269,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,597,084 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.