You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Where paths meet and cross: navigation by path integration in the desert ant and the honeybee
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, May 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00359-015-1000-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mandyam V. Srinivasan |
Abstract |
Animals that travel large distances in search of food need to be equipped with navigation systems that are capable of keeping track of the distance and direction of travel throughout their outbound journey, so that they may return home expeditiously and without losing their way. The challenge of homing is especially acute when the environment is devoid of landmarks. Desert ants and honeybees are able to meet this challenge, despite their minuscule brains and restricted computational capacity. This article reviews some of the processes and mechanisms that underlie the homing abilities of these creatures, which are among the best-understood navigators in the animal kingdom. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 112 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 34% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 16% |
Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
Researcher | 13 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 45% |
Neuroscience | 19 | 16% |
Engineering | 10 | 9% |
Computer Science | 9 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 9% |
Unknown | 11 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
#743,864
of 24,597,084 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#25
of 1,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,944
of 269,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,597,084 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.