| Title |
Practical, Unified, Motion and Missing Data Treatment in Degraded Video
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, January 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:jmiv.0000011322.17255.85 |
| Authors |
Anil Kokaram |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 28% |
| Researcher | 3 | 17% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 7 | 39% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 17% |
| Engineering | 2 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2010.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
#69
of 341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,570
of 143,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 341 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.