↓ Skip to main content

Protein folding in vivo and renaturation of recombinant proteins from inclusion bodies

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Biotechnology, August 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Protein folding in vivo and renaturation of recombinant proteins from inclusion bodies
Published in
Molecular Biotechnology, August 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf02762323
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew D. Guise, Shuna M. West, Julian B. Chaudhuri

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 6%
United Kingdom 2 6%
South Africa 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 29 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 28%
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 17%
Engineering 2 6%
Chemistry 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2010.
All research outputs
#7,561,502
of 23,065,445 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Biotechnology
#280
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,359
of 29,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Biotechnology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,065,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.