You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reliability of the Transepicondylar Axis as an Anatomical Landmark in Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Arthroplasty, September 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.arth.2005.10.020 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bernd Stoeckl, Michael Nogler, Martin Krismer, Claudia Beimel, Jose-Luis Moctezuma de la Barrera, Oliver Kessler |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 19% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 38% |
| Engineering | 7 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2010.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#2,085
of 4,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,677
of 89,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.