| Title |
Injectable microstimulator for functional electrical stimulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, November 1991
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02446097 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
G. E. Loeb, C. J. Zamin, J. H. Schulman, P. R. Troyk |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 27 | 47% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#547
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,028
of 16,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.