| Title |
Initializing K-means Batch Clustering: A Critical Evaluation of Several Techniques
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Classification, June 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00357-007-0003-0 |
| Authors |
Douglas Steinley, Michael J. Brusco |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 32 | 24% |
| Engineering | 13 | 10% |
| Psychology | 9 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 26% |
| Unknown | 29 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2010.
All research outputs
#7,561,502
of 23,065,445 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Classification
#31
of 94 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,126
of 71,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Classification
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,065,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them