↓ Skip to main content

Guideline for the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions

Overview of attention for article published in Allergo Journal International, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 126)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Guideline for the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions
Published in
Allergo Journal International, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40629-015-0052-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Knut Brockow, Bernhard Przybilla, Werner Aberer, Andreas J. Bircher, Randolf Brehler, Heinrich Dickel, Thomas Fuchs, Thilo Jakob, Lars Lange, Wolfgang Pfützner, Maja Mockenhaupt, Hagen Ott, Oliver Pfaar, Johannes Ring, Bernhardt Sachs, Helmut Sitter, Axel Trautmann, Regina Treudler, Bettina Wedi, Margitta Worm, Gerda Wurpts, Torsten Zuberbier, Hans F. Merk

Abstract

Drug hypersensitivity reactions are unpredictable adverse drug reactions. They manifest either within 1-6 h following drug intake (immediate reactions) with mild to life-threatening symptoms of anaphylaxis, or several hours to days later (delayed reactions), primarily as exanthematous eruptions. It is not always possible to detect involvement of the immune system (allergy). Waiving diagnostic tests can result in severe reactions on renewed exposure on the one hand, and to unjustified treatment restrictions on the other. With this guideline, experts from various specialist societies and institutions have formulated recommendations and an algorithm for the diagnosis of allergies. The key principles of diagnosing allergic/hypersensitivity drug reactions are presented. Where possible, the objective is to perform allergy diagnostics within 4 weeks-6 months following the reaction. A clinical classification of symptoms based on the morphology and time course of the reaction is required in order to plan a diagnostic work-up. In the case of typical symptoms of a drug hypersensitivity reaction and unequivocal findings from validated skin and/or laboratory tests, a reaction can be attributed to a trigger with sufficient confidence. However, skin and laboratory tests are often negative or insufficiently reliable. In such cases, controlled provocation testing is required to clarify drug reactions. This method is reliable and safe when attention is paid to indications and contraindications and performed under appropriate medical supervision. The results of the overall assessment are discussed with the patient and documented in an "allergy passport" in order to ensure targeted avoidance in the future and allow the use of alternative drugs where possible.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 132 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 17%
Other 17 13%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Master 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 44 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 47 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,216,588
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Allergo Journal International
#22
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,355
of 279,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Allergo Journal International
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them