| Title |
Elucidating in vitro cell-cell interaction using a microfluidic coculture system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biomedical Microdevices, March 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10544-006-6384-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cheng-Wey Wei, Ji-Yen Cheng, Tai-Horng Young |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 36% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 17 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,447,868
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Microdevices
#233
of 747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,688
of 71,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Microdevices
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 747 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.