You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Why babies should never sleep alone: A review of the co-sleeping controversy in relation to SIDS, bedsharing and breast feeding
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, June 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.prrv.2005.03.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James J. McKenna, Thomas McDade |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Thailand | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 84% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 310 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 77 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 15% |
| Researcher | 39 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 66 | 20% |
| Unknown | 44 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 69 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 46 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 15% |
| Unknown | 45 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#478,676
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Paediatric Respiratory Reviews
#4
of 700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#529
of 70,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Paediatric Respiratory Reviews
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them