You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Improving Conservation Outcomes with a New Paradigm for Understanding Species’ Fundamental and Realized Adaptive Capacity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Conservation Letters, August 2015
|
DOI | 10.1111/conl.12190 |
Authors |
Erik A Beever, John O'Leary, Claudia Mengelt, Jordan M West, Susan Julius, Nancy Green, Dawn Magness, Laura Petes, Bruce Stein, Adrienne B Nicotra, Jessica J Hellmann, Amanda L Robertson, Michelle D Staudinger, Andrew A Rosenberg, Eleanora Babij, Jean Brennan, Gregor W Schuurman, Gretchen E Hofmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 20% |
Hungary | 1 | 10% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 359 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 1% |
Portugal | 2 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 346 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 83 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 19% |
Student > Master | 56 | 16% |
Other | 21 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 5% |
Other | 46 | 13% |
Unknown | 64 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 123 | 34% |
Environmental Science | 99 | 28% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 1% |
Other | 17 | 5% |
Unknown | 93 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,327,257
of 24,945,754 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#428
of 1,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,909
of 269,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,945,754 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.