| Title |
Methylene blue prevents neurodegeneration caused by rotenone in the retina
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurotoxicity Research, March 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf03033307 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xian Zhang, Julio C. Rojas, F. Gonzalez-Lima |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 38% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,802,027
of 25,388,229 outputs
Outputs from Neurotoxicity Research
#72
of 924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,130
of 90,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotoxicity Research
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.