↓ Skip to main content

Volume accommodation during swallowing

Overview of attention for article published in Dysphagia, June 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Volume accommodation during swallowing
Published in
Dysphagia, June 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf01354548
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter J. Kahrilas, Jeri A. Logemann

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 31%
Linguistics 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2012.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#597
of 1,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,182
of 21,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.