| Title |
A written language intervention for at-risk second grade students: a randomized controlled trial of the process assessment of the learner lesson plans in a tier 2 response-to-intervention (RtI) model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Dyslexia, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11881-011-0056-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen R. Hooper, Lara-Jeane C. Costa, Matthew McBee, Kathleen L. Anderson, Donna Carlson Yerby, Amy Childress, Sean B. Knuth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 135 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 17% |
| Unknown | 37 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 35 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 44 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2015.
All research outputs
#14,230,708
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Dyslexia
#160
of 247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,045
of 120,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Dyslexia
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.