Title |
Contextual void patching for digital elevation models
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Visual Computer, June 2007
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00371-007-0148-1 |
Authors |
Lakin Wecker, Faramarz Samavati, Marina Gavrilova |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 38% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 25% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 38% |
Computer Science | 3 | 38% |
Mathematics | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2011.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from The Visual Computer
#169
of 1,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,426
of 70,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Visual Computer
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,264 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.