↓ Skip to main content

Pentazocine use among people who inject drugs in India

Overview of attention for article published in Asian Journal of Psychiatry, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pentazocine use among people who inject drugs in India
Published in
Asian Journal of Psychiatry, July 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ajp.2015.06.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aditya Pawar, Aarya Krishnan Rajalakshmi, Ravi Prakash Upadhyay

Abstract

Data regarding prevalence of Pentazocine use is sparse and intervention strategies aimed at it are meager. In view of the fact that Pentazocine has significant abuse potential contrary to what was earlier thought, along with the actuality that people who use injectable Pentazocine are at risk of various complications as HIV, this domain needs more attention. This review examines the extent of the problem of Pentazocine use with consequent effects on the overall health of the people. It is based on nationally representative large scale survey(s) and other reliable documented data on Pentazocine abuse. Possible strategies and future lines of actions have been delineated. Data suggests Pentazocine use from 0.1% to 21.8% in different parts of the country. Various reports have also linked it with unique health complications. Its use has been reported mostly among subjects seeking treatment, with recent reports suggesting increasing use at street level. The strategies to document the extent of injection drug use applied in most cases might not be adequate. There is a need for further research and monitoring to document the burden of the problem. Indirect methods to estimate the extent of problem may need to be implemented and regulatory mechanisms for prescription drug use may need to be strengthened.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Student > Master 3 23%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 15%
Chemistry 2 15%
Psychology 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2015.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Asian Journal of Psychiatry
#768
of 1,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,266
of 277,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Journal of Psychiatry
#17
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.