↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in the management of major exsanguination

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
Title
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in the management of major exsanguination
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00068-018-0959-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. L. S. Borger van der Burg, Thijs T. C. F. van Dongen, J. J. Morrison, P. P. A. Hedeman Joosten, J. J. DuBose, T. M. Hörer, R. Hoencamp

Abstract

Circulatory collapse is a leading cause of mortality among traumatic major exsanguination and in ruptured aortic aneurysm patients. Approximately 40% of patients die before hemorrhage control is achieved. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an adjunct designed to sustain the circulation until definitive surgical or endovascular repair. A systematic review was conducted for the current clinical use of REBOA in patients with hemodynamic instability and to discuss its potential role in improving prehospital and in-hospital outcome. Systematic review and meta-analysis (1900-2017) using MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, Web of Science and Central and Emcare using the keywords "aortic balloon occlusion", "aortic balloon tamponade", "REBOA", and "Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion" in combination with hemorrhage control, hemorrhage, resuscitation, shock, ruptured abdominal or thoracic aorta, endovascular repair, and open repair. Original published studies on human subjects were considered. A total of 490 studies were identified; 89 met criteria for inclusion. Of the 1436 patients, overall reported mortality was 49.2% (613/1246) with significant differences (p < 0.001) between clinical indications. Hemodynamic shock was evident in 79.3%, values between clinical indications showed significant difference (p < 0.001). REBOA was favored as treatment in trauma patients in terms of mortality. Pooled analysis demonstrated an increase in mean systolic pressure by almost 50 mmHg following REBOA use. REBOA has been used in trauma patients and ruptured aortic aneurysm patients with improvement of hemodynamic parameters and outcomes for several decades. Formal, prospective study is warranted to clarify the role of this adjunct in all hemodynamic unstable patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 181 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 24 13%
Researcher 23 13%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 37 20%
Unknown 47 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Unspecified 4 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 58 32%