↓ Skip to main content

Cohort Profile Update: Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Epidemiology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
208 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cohort Profile Update: Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health
Published in
International Journal of Epidemiology, June 2015
DOI 10.1093/ije/dyv110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annette J Dobson, Richard Hockey, Wendy J Brown, Julie E Byles, Deborah J Loxton, Deirdre McLaughlin, Leigh R Tooth, Gita D Mishra

Abstract

In 1996 the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health recruited a nationally representative sample of more than 40 000 women in three age cohorts, born in 1973-78, 1946-51 and 1921-26. At least six waves of 3-yearly surveys have been completed. Although the focus remains on factors affecting the health and well-being of women and their access to and use of health services across urban, rural and remote areas of Australia, the study has now been considerably expanded by linkage to other health data sets. For most women who have ever participated in the study, linked records are now available for: government-subsidized non-hospital services (e.g. all general practitioner visits); pharmaceutical prescriptions filled; national death index, including codes for multiple causes of death; aged care assessments and services; cancer registries; and, for most states and territories, hospital admissions and perinatal data. Additionally, a large cohort of women born in 1989-95 have been recruited. The data are available to approved collaborators, with more than 780 researchers using the data so far. Full details of the study materials and data access procedures are available at [http://www.alswh.org.au/].

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 60 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Librarian 2 3%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 18 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 27%
Psychology 5 8%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 19 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,712,517
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Epidemiology
#5,496
of 5,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,469
of 263,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Epidemiology
#75
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.